Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:16

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Stellar Blade More Than Doubles Sony’s Previous Steam CCU Record for Single Player Games - Wccftech
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
3 No-Brainer AI Stocks to Buy Right Now - Yahoo Finance
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
NASA to silence Voyager's social media accounts - theregister.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
The heaviest proton emitter: New type of atomic nucleus discovered - Phys.org
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Study Links Gut Bacteria to MS Risk and Reveals Key Triggers - Neuroscience News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
There’s a hidden rule that all life on Earth must follow, research claims - Boy Genius Report